Evaluating virtual visits for contraceptive counseling: An exploratory study using the Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling (PCCC) scale, a patient-reported outcome measure.

OBJECTIVES: To describe patient-reported quality of care for virtual contraceptive counseling, using the four-item Person-Centered Contraception Counseling (PCCC) scale. Secondary analyses evaluated PCCC scores by patient subgroups. STUDY DESIGN: From December 2021 to May 2022, we offered an anonymous web-based survey, to English and Spanish-speaking female patients 18 to 45 years old who had virtual visits through two Family Planning offices affiliated with Columbia University/New York Presbyterian Hospital in New York City. RESULTS: Among 196 respondents, 133 (68%) respondents gave the top score. The proportion who gave the top PCCC score was higher for the faculty-based practice vs. community-based practice (62% vs. 38% respectively, p = 0.02), video vs. telephone (84% vs. 16% respectively, p = 0.01), and English vs. Spanish (86% vs. 14% respectively, p = 0.02); but did not differ for ethnicity (p = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-perceived quality of contraceptive counseling in virtual visits was high, with some disparities seen in the subgroups. IMPLICATIONS: This exploratory study about contraceptive counseling during virtual visits showed that 68% of survey respondents gave the top box PCCC score. Our work also suggests disparities in patient experiences based on several factors. Future work may expand on nuances of disparities and how these influence care.

Understanding pre-residency abortion training pathways and career choices in the United States: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Many factors contribute to the decision to provide abortion in the United States. We aim to describe pre-residency experiences and decisions that contribute to choosing a career as an abortion provider in the United States. METHODS: We conducted 60-min semi-structured telephone interviews with 34 current abortion care providers about their career trajectories, decision-making and planning. Interviews were transcribed and coded by three members of the research team using thematic analysis. RESULTS: A majority of the participants considered (73.5%, n=25) and firmly committed (62.8%, n=22) to providing abortion care prior to entering residency. They described important professional experiences with women's health and reproductive rights, as well as personal experiences with abortion care, all of which inspired them to seek out abortion training during medical school and residency. Participants also described a dearth of mentors or role models until late in training, especially for family physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the decision to provide abortion care is often made prior to residency training, before or during medical school, so additional support may be needed to promote exposure to abortion care during undergraduate medical education or even before. Further, there is a need for improved mentorship and role modelling during these periods, especially for family physicians. This may be especially critical after the overturn of Roe v Wade, as medical schools in restrictive states may not be able to provide abortions to patients, depriving students of role models who are abortion providers.

U.S. physicians' perspectives on the complexities and challenges of permanent contraception provision.

OBJECTIVES: Evidence shows many misconceptions exist around permanent contraception, and there are numerous barriers to accessing the procedure. This qualitative study explored physician perspectives regarding patients' informational and decision-support needs, the complexities and challenges of counseling and access, and how these factors may differ for people living on lower incomes. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted 15 semistructured, telephone interviews with obstetrician-gynecologists in three geographic regions of the United States to explore their perspectives on providing permanent contraception counseling and care. We analyzed the interviews using content analysis. RESULTS: Physicians discussed a tension between respecting individual reproductive autonomy and concern for future regret; they wanted to support patients' desire for permanent contraception but were frequently concerned patients did not have the information they needed or the foresight to make high-quality decisions. Physicians also identified barriers to counseling including lack of time, lack of continuity over the course of prenatal care, and baseline misinformation among patients. Physicians identified additional barriers in providing a postpartum procedure even after thedecision was made including lack of personnel and operating room availability. Finally, physicians felt that people living on lower incomes faced more challenges in access primarily due to the sterilization consent regulations required by Medicaid. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians report numerous challenges surrounding permanent contraception provision and access. Strategies are needed to support physicians and patients to enhance high-quality, patient-centered sterilization decision making and ensure that patients are able to access a permanent contraceptive procedure when desired. IMPLICATIONS: This qualitative study demonstrates the various challenges faced by physicians to support permanent contraception decision making. These challenges may limit patients' access to the care they desire. This study supports the need to transform care delivery models and improve the federal sterilization policy to ensure equitable patient-centered access to desired permanent contraception. DISCLAIMER: Although the term permanent contraception has increasingly replaced the word sterilization in clinical settings, we use sterilization in some places throughout this paper as that was the standard terminology at the time the interviews were conducted and the language the interviewed physicians used.